Well, now that is "different, to say the least. How would one judge whether this was the real deal or a visual manipulation?
You stated that you have "seen Yah'shua" on more than one occasion. Would you mind testifying about your "experience". Thank you dear brother. Thank you for sharing this as well. Interesting.

Lahry

He has always appeared in white robes, never fancy Talmudic garb, and NEVER with his head covered, usually with a golden belt and sandals on his feet, but nothing else. These are visions I have seen over the last two decades.

I neglected to mention in my first post on this subject that the garb "Yah'shua" is wearing in this photo did not exist in His time. See:

http://messianicevangelicals.ning.com/group/messianicfaq/forum/topi...

Lahry Sibley said:

Well, now that is "different, to say the least. How would one judge whether this was the real deal or a visual manipulation?
You stated that you have "seen Yah'shua" on more than one occasion. Would you mind testifying about your "experience". Thank you dear brother. Thank you for sharing this as well. Interesting.

Lahry

See why you are such an invaluable resource? Do you know a man named A.W. Bowman? He seems to be up to speed on jewish culture and religion as you are. Thanks for being here, brother Chris. You are a blessing to me.

Shalom,

Lahry

Lev/Christopher said:

He has always appeared in white robes, never fancy Talmudic garb, and NEVER with his head covered, usually with a golden belt and sandals on his feet, but nothing else. These are visions I have seen over the last two decades.

I neglected to mention in my first post on this subject that the garb "Yah'shua" is wearing in this photo did not exist in His time. See:

http://messianicevangelicals.ning.com/group/messianicfaq/forum/topi...

Lahry Sibley said:

Well, now that is "different, to say the least. How would one judge whether this was the real deal or a visual manipulation?
You stated that you have "seen Yah'shua" on more than one occasion. Would you mind testifying about your "experience". Thank you dear brother. Thank you for sharing this as well. Interesting.

Lahry

As I told you in IM this morning, Lev, if you look closely, its the woman in the first picture and the prayer shawl is her's. The document itself even says she was laying hands on people. The difference is that there's a male face with what appears to be tefillin (phylacteries) in the picture, as if a male Jewish man's face was transposed over her face (possibly demonic).

So no, "He" isn't wearing a kilt, that's her skirt. ;)

Ah I see what you're driving at, DR. And actually "his" hands are on the chair she's sitting in, not her back (though the orginal intent I suggested is still the same). And if you look at "his" chest you will see the usual female protrustions. I expect this was the organist's assistant orginally for tuning the music score pages. You'd have thought he demonic would have been more imaginative. Whatever it's ultimate source, it is not of Yahweh, and the fact that the ministry's leader is trying to promote it to defend his own belief about dress is rather alarming. Either this is a fake picture promoted by someone in that organisation to promote the organisation or this is a demonic ploy to deceive. Either way I believe Yahweh is using this to show that they lack discernment and relates to a prophecy I made a while back, based on a vision Yahweh gave me, that this ministry would collapse. I take this is yet one more confirming sign.