I think there is a danger of semantics here. One things commentators have been almost universally agreed upon over the centuries is that Yah'shua raised the bar of loving character. Thus:

John 13:34-35
34 A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another."
NKJV

Is this a new (or "renewed" commandment as one version (RSTNE) puts it or "unused" as another one (MRC)has it). Antinomians, of course, teach that this "new commandment" replaces all the others which we know to be false because as He and the apostles clearly taught, love and obedience (even in externals) go together. I do believe the antinomians are right about one thing, though, and that is the commandment to love one another embraces and includes all those previous commandments not fulfilled by the atonement of Messiah, altering them not in word but in substance. If a general "raising of the bar" is going on, meaning an elevation of standards (as evidenced by Yah'shua tightening up on the Mosaic divorce laws, reminding his listeners and readers that He now expected divorce to become a thing of the past when the bar was considerably lower, "as it was in the beginning"), then ALL the mitzvot must be raised too. This is logical when you consider, for example, the Levitical system as a whole which has been "raised" back to the former Melchizedek level (though actually higher than even that), and in so doing, was shorn of all the preparatory types and figures of the sacrificia, system. So really, it depends what you mean by the pivotal verb "expanding" which can mean many things.

For example (if I may be so bold), I see from your picture that you wear a phylactery but not a beard. I do not know what your basis for this arrangement is (since obviously I do not know you), but from my studies of these and similar issues, you view the use of the phylactery as something literally mandated (I do not, as you probably know) but the beard as not. As ever there are always halacha issues and until the fullness of the Messianic Halachah comes with the return of Yah'shua, I doubt there will ever be unity of these things in the Body of Messiah. It does illustrate one of the problems we face in exegesis.

Obviously a lot more could be said that I share my thoughts on these matters as a basis for possible further comment.

Shalom!